Compliance Costs: Implementing AML Course measures can be expensive for financial institutions, especially smaller ones, as it involves investing in technology, staff training, and ongoing compliance monitoring.

False Positives: AML Course systems can generate false positives, flagging legitimate transactions as suspicious. This can result in delays, inconvenience to customers, and additional administrative burden for institutions to investigate and clear these false alarms.

Complexity and Burden: The regulatory landscape for AML Course is complex, and financial institutions may find it challenging to keep up with ever-changing requirements. The burden of compliance can be overwhelming, leading to potential errors or oversight.

Impact on Financial Inclusion: Stricter AML Course regulations can sometimes create barriers for individuals with limited financial histories or those in vulnerable populations, making it harder for them to access financial services.

Evolving Techniques of Money Laundering: Criminals continuously adapt their techniques to evade AML measures. As a result, AML Course efforts need to be dynamic and adaptive, requiring continuous updates and improvements to stay effective.

Despite the disadvantages, AML Course remains crucial in combating financial crime and ensuring the stability of the global financial system. Striking a balance between effective AML Course measures and mitigating potential negative impacts is an ongoing challenge for regulators and financial institutions.